Category: Macro Economics

Categories
Macro Economics Uncategorized

The Heart of American Innovation: Celebrating Small Business Week

As National Small Business Week concludes, we celebrate the cornerstone of our economy: small businesses. Take Iowa as an example of a typical state in the Heartland, or North Carolina, where a growing tech corridor has given rise to thousands of small businesses, where small businesses comprise 99.3% of all enterprises and employ nearly half of the state’s workforce. This vibrant entrepreneurial spirit mirrors the nation’s, where small businesses drive innovation, create jobs, and fuel economic growth. Remarkably, every trillion-dollar company that dominates today’s global markets began as a small business with a bold idea, a determined founder, and a vision for something greater.

Consider the humble beginnings of America’s corporate giants. Apple, now valued at over $3 trillion, started in 1976 in Steve Jobs’ garage, where he and Steve Wozniak built the first Apple computer. Their mission to democratize technology transformed a small startup into a global leader. Similarly, Amazon, another trillion-dollar titan, began in 1994 as an online bookstore in Jeff Bezos’ garage. Its focus on customer convenience reshaped retail and cloud computing.

Microsoft, with a valuation exceeding $3 trillion, was founded in 1975 by Bill Gates and Paul Allen, two young programmers crafting software to power personal computing. Their small venture became a cornerstone of modern technology. Alphabet, Google’s parent company, originated in 1998 as a dorm-room project by Larry Page and Sergey Brin. Their search engine evolved into a conglomerate leading in artificial intelligence and cloud services.

These stories embody the American Dream, as told by people like Maria Gonzales, who launched a bakery in rural Kansas with just her grandmother’s recipes and a food truck. Today, she employs 15 people and supplies regional grocery chains. “It started as a dream,” Maria says, “but in America, dreams come true if you’re willing to work for them.” born in small businesses across states like Iowa, where innovation thrives in communities large and small. The U.S. Small Business Administration reports that small businesses employ 46% of the nation’s private workforce and contribute 44% of economic activity. They are the testing grounds for big ideas, where entrepreneurs take risks that spark breakthroughs.

As we honor National Small Business Week, let’s recognize the potential in every small business, from Iowa’s Heartland to every corner of the nation. The next trillion-dollar company could be emerging in a small town, a bustling city, or a quiet suburb. By supporting small businesses—through shopping local, advocating for regulatory reform to reduce burdensome red tape, expanding access to capital through community banks and SBA-backed loans, offering mentorship programs, and integrating local businesses into supply chains—we patronage, policy, and community engagement—we cultivate the seeds of tomorrow’s giants. Let’s celebrate the entrepreneurs who dare to dream big, knowing that every global leader was once a small business with a spark of possibility.

Here’s to America’s small businesses—today’s innovators, tomorrow’s titans.

And let’s be clear: only in the United States of America—where supportive infrastructure like SBA loans, tech incubators, and startup grants give entrepreneurs a real shot—can the little guy in a garage go toe-to-toe with global giants—and win. We are the land of opportunity, fueled by free markets, faith in innovation, and the unshakable belief that with enough grit and guts, a startup can become a trillion-dollar powerhouse. That’s not just a dream—that’s American exceptionalism in action. So let’s double down on freedom, enterprise, and the entrepreneurial spirit that made this country great.

Categories
Government Macro Economics Uncategorized

The GENIUS Act – A Strategic Leap Toward Stablecoin Hegemony for the U.S. Dollar

The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act of 2025, commonly known as the GENIUS Act, represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of American financial policy. As the U.S. Senate prepares to vote on this legislation, the act’s potential to reshape the global financial landscape by reinforcing the dominance of the U.S. dollar through stablecoin innovation cannot be overstated. Chamath Palihapitiya, a prominent venture capitalist and influential voice in technology and finance, has championed the bill, stating on May 8, 2025, “This bill is smart and needs to pass when up for vote today. It’s the most obvious way of shifting past petrodollar hegemony for the USD and replacing it with stablecoin hegemony for the USD.” His endorsement underscores the act’s transformative promise, and a closer examination of its merits reveals why it deserves bipartisan support.

The GENIUS Act establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stablecoins—digital assets pegged to a fixed monetary value, typically the U.S. dollar—designed to ensure financial stability, transparency, and consumer protection. By defining clear rules for issuers, the legislation addresses long-standing regulatory ambiguity that has hindered the stablecoin market’s growth in the United States. The act permits entities, whether associated with insured banks or operating independently, to issue stablecoins under either federal or state oversight, depending on their market capitalization. Issuers with over $10 billion in stablecoins face joint state-federal regulation or state-administered federal standards, while smaller issuers may opt for state-specific regimes that mirror federal requirements. This dual framework balances innovation with oversight, fostering a competitive yet secure market.

One of the act’s most compelling merits is its potential to reinforce the global dominance of the U.S. dollar. Stablecoins, by design, are often backed by dollar-denominated assets such as U.S. Treasury securities, creating significant demand for these instruments. Standard Chartered estimates that the GENIUS Act could drive the total stablecoin supply from $230 billion today to $2 trillion by the end of 2028, absorbing substantial U.S. Treasury bill issuance during this period. This surge in demand not only strengthens the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency but also aligns with Palihapitiya’s vision of transitioning from petrodollar hegemony—where the dollar’s dominance is tied to oil trade—to stablecoin hegemony, where digital currencies amplify its reach in global transactions. By providing a clear legal pathway for stablecoin issuance, the GENIUS Act positions the United States to lead this shift, ensuring that dollar-backed stablecoins like USDC and USDT remain preeminent in the global market.

Moreover, the act enhances transparency and consumer trust, addressing concerns that have plagued the crypto industry. It imposes bank-like regulations on issuers, including capital, liquidity, and risk management standards, and categorizes them as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act for anti-money laundering purposes. These measures ensure that stablecoin reserves are fully backed by compliant assets, mitigating risks of price manipulation or coin failures. For established issuers like Circle, compliance with these standards could boost institutional adoption, while non-compliant players, such as Tether, may need to restructure to compete in the U.S. market. This leveled playing field fosters a more resilient stablecoin ecosystem, benefiting consumers and investors alike.

The bipartisan support for the GENIUS Act, evidenced by its 18-6 passage through the Senate Banking Committee on March 13, 2025, reflects its broad appeal. Industry leaders, such as Circle’s Chief Strategy Officer Dante Disparte, have praised the bill as “historic and bipartisan progress” toward an “America-first framework” for stablecoin regulation. Even as critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, raise concerns about potential risks and corruption—particularly in light of recent stablecoin ventures tied to political figures—the act’s robust regulatory safeguards address many of these issues. For instance, its focus on compliance and oversight aims to curb illicit finance, while amendments could further strengthen protections against conflicts of interest.

Critics like Vance Spencer of Framework Ventures argue that overly restrictive regulations could push stablecoin innovation offshore, potentially weakening dollar hegemony. However, the GENIUS Act’s pragmatic approach, blending federal standards with state flexibility, mitigates this risk by encouraging domestic innovation while maintaining global competitiveness. The bill’s emphasis on international cooperation and a Treasury study on stablecoin reserves further ensures that the U.S. remains a leader in shaping global standards.

In conclusion, the GENIUS Act is a forward-thinking piece of legislation that aligns with the United States’ strategic interests in maintaining financial leadership. By establishing a clear, balanced framework for stablecoin regulation, it paves the way for the dollar to dominate the digital economy, as Palihapitiya envisions, through “stablecoin hegemony for the USD.” The act’s ability to foster innovation, enhance transparency, and bolster the dollar’s global role makes it a critical step toward a modernized financial system. As the Senate votes today, lawmakers have an opportunity to enact a policy that not only addresses immediate regulatory needs but also secures America’s economic dominance for decades to come. The GENIUS Act is, indeed, a stroke of genius, and its passage should be a priority.

The Benefits of Stablecoins

Stablecoins are digital currencies designed to maintain a stable value, typically pegged to a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar or other assets such as gold. Their unique characteristics offer significant benefits across financial systems, economies, and individual users. Below is a detailed explanation of the key advantages of stablecoins.

  1. Price Stability

Stablecoins mitigate the volatility commonly associated with cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum. By pegging their value to stable assets—such as the U.S. dollar, U.S. Treasury securities, or other low-risk instruments—stablecoins maintain consistent purchasing power. This stability makes them suitable for everyday transactions, savings, and financial planning, unlike volatile cryptocurrencies that can fluctuate dramatically in value. For example, a stablecoin like USDC ensures that 1 USDC remains equivalent to approximately 1 USD, providing predictability for users and businesses.

  1. Efficiency in Transactions

Stablecoins enable fast, low-cost transactions on blockchain networks, bypassing traditional financial intermediaries like banks or payment processors. This efficiency is particularly valuable for cross-border payments, which are often slow and expensive due to correspondent banking networks and currency conversion fees. Stablecoins can settle transactions in minutes, if not seconds, with minimal fees, making them an attractive alternative for remittances, international trade, and peer-to-peer transfers. For instance, a freelancer in Asia can receive payment in USDC from a U.S. client instantly, avoiding delays and high wire transfer costs.

  1. Global Accessibility and Financial Inclusion

Stablecoins operate on decentralized blockchain networks, accessible to anyone with an internet connection and a digital wallet. This democratizes access to financial services, particularly for unbanked or underbanked populations who lack access to traditional banking infrastructure. Stablecoins allow individuals in developing economies to store value in a dollar-pegged asset, hedge against local currency depreciation, and participate in global markets. For example, in countries with hyperinflation, such as Venezuela or Zimbabwe, stablecoins provide a stable store of value and a medium of exchange, empowering individuals to preserve their wealth.

  1. Strengthening the U.S. Dollar’s Global Dominance

Dollar-pegged stablecoins, such as USDC or USDT, reinforce the U.S. dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency. These stablecoins are often backed by dollar-denominated assets, such as cash or U.S. Treasury securities, creating significant demand for these instruments. As stablecoin adoption grows, this demand can absorb U.S. debt issuance, lower borrowing costs, and extend the dollar’s influence in global trade and digital economies. The GENIUS Act, for instance, is projected to drive stablecoin supply to $2 trillion by 2028, amplifying the dollar’s reach through what has been termed “stablecoin hegemony.”

  1. Transparency and Programmability

Stablecoins leverage blockchain technology, which provides transparent, immutable transaction records. Many stablecoin issuers, such as Circle (USDC), publish regular attestations of their reserve assets, ensuring that each coin is fully backed by equivalent value. This transparency builds trust among users and regulators. Additionally, stablecoins are programmable, enabling integration into smart contracts and decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. This programmability supports innovative use cases, such as automated payments, decentralized lending, and tokenized asset trading, enhancing efficiency in financial ecosystems.

  1. Interoperability with Digital Economies

Stablecoins serve as a bridge between traditional finance and emerging digital economies, including DeFi, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and the metaverse. They provide a stable medium of exchange for digital transactions, enabling seamless interactions across platforms. For example, a user can purchase an NFT or invest in a DeFi protocol using USDC without worrying about cryptocurrency price swings. This interoperability fosters innovation and drives adoption of blockchain-based technologies.

  1. Reduced Counterparty Risk

Unlike traditional financial systems, where transactions rely on intermediaries like banks or clearinghouses, stablecoin transactions occur directly on blockchains, reducing counterparty risk. Once a transaction is confirmed, it is final and irreversible, minimizing the risk of default or fraud by third parties. This feature is particularly valuable for high-value transactions or in regions with unstable financial institutions.

  1. Support for Monetary Policy and Economic Stability

By increasing demand for U.S. Treasury securities and other dollar-based assets, stablecoins can indirectly support U.S. monetary policy. As stablecoin issuers hold reserves in these assets, they contribute to market stability and liquidity. Furthermore, stablecoins can serve as a tool for central banks exploring digital currencies. For instance, research into central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) often draws on stablecoin models, highlighting their potential to modernize monetary systems.

Considerations and Challenges

While stablecoins offer numerous benefits, they are not without risks. Regulatory uncertainty, potential reserve mismanagement, and concerns about illicit use require robust oversight, as proposed by frameworks like the GENIUS Act. Ensuring that stablecoins are fully backed by high-quality assets and comply with anti-money laundering standards is critical to maintaining trust and stability.

Conclusion

Stablecoins represent a transformative innovation in the financial landscape, offering price stability, transactional efficiency, global accessibility, and support for the U.S. dollar’s global dominance. Their ability to foster financial inclusion, enhance transparency, and integrate with digital economies positions them as a cornerstone of modern finance. By addressing regulatory challenges, as the GENIUS Act aims to do, stablecoins can unlock their full potential, benefiting individuals, businesses, and economies worldwide while reinforcing the U.S. dollar’s enduring influence.

 

Categories
Geo Politics Macro Economics

Recovering America’s Economic Sovereignty America’s dangerous dependence on China for rare earth minerals

America’s dangerous dependence on China for rare earth minerals — the essential building blocks for everything from fighter jets to smartphones — is not a coincidence. It is the inevitable result of decades of misguided policy decisions, regulatory paralysis, and a globalist mindset that surrendered critical industries to foreign adversaries. While China strategically built a near-monopoly by subsidizing production and slashing red tape, America shackled its own industries with endless permitting delays, environmental extremism, and wishful thinking about “free trade” in a world where our biggest competitor was playing by no rules at all.

By the early 2000s, China controlled over 90% of global rare earth production. They didn’t just mine the minerals — they cornered the critical downstream processing and manufacturing supply chains. America, once the leader, became a customer. A dependent. For decades, policymakers sat idle as China plotted to dominate industries critical to our national security.

Background: How We Lost the Lead

Back in the 1980s, America led the world in rare earth production, with Mountain Pass in California operating as the premier source. Then came the regulatory avalanche. Permitting for a new mining project in the United States routinely took 7 to 10 years, and in many cases, projects never even got off the ground. Environmental impact studies, endless layers of agency reviews, and “lawfare” from radical environmental groups weaponized litigation to block, delay, and destroy mining projects.

Between 1990 and 2020, the United States issued fewer than a handful of new mining permits for rare earths. Companies often didn’t even bother applying, knowing the costs, lawsuits, and bureaucratic delays would kill projects before a shovel ever touched dirt.

Meanwhile, China was executing a deliberate plan: flooding the market with cheap rare earths, subsidizing production, slashing environmental standards, and building refining plants at breakneck speed. Their strategy worked. America’s industrial base was hollowed out.

China Tightens the Screws: New Export Restrictions

Today, China is restricting exports of key rare earth materials to the United States. It’s a calculated move to weaponize their monopoly against us. By controlling access to materials essential for national defense, energy infrastructure, and advanced manufacturing, China has gained powerful leverage over American policymakers.

In effect, we handed Beijing the keys to our future technologies and military readiness. This is the price of decades of short-term profit-seeking and environmental radicalism overriding strategic national interests.

What We Must Do: A National Mobilization for Rare Earth Dominance

We must act — and act decisively! This is not a policy tweak. It is a full-scale economic mobilization, like building the Arsenal of Democracy during World War II.


  • Here’s the game plan:
  • Expedite Permitting
  • Invest in Domestic Projects
  • Build American Processing Capacity
  • Strategic Stockpiling
  • Streamline Environmental Reviews — Without Sacrificing Common Sense
  • Forge International Alliances

Conclusion: Reclaiming Our Industrial Future

Make no mistake: This isn’t just about economics. It’s about national security. It’s about American sovereignty. It’s about protecting our freedom.

China’s dominance in rare earths was no accident. It was a strategy — executed ruthlessly. Now it’s our turn to be strategic. If we act boldly — if we act NOW — we can restore America’s rightful place as a mineral, manufacturing, and innovation powerhouse.

This is a second Sputnik moment. Our future — our freedom — depends on reclaiming control over the very building blocks of modern civilization.

As I always say: Free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity, but it needs a level playing field. That means no more being held hostage to China’s whims. Drill, mine, process — and most of all — LEAD.

The future belongs to the free and the brave — not the Communist Party of China.

Congress must act. Investors must act. Entrepreneurs must act. America must act.

Imagine an America once again supplying the world with the resources of the future — cleaner, stronger, freer. That future is within our grasp. Let’s seize it.

 

 

 

 

How We Got Here: China’s Rare Earth Monopoly and America’s Wake-Up Call

America’s dangerous dependence on China for rare earth minerals — the essential building blocks for everything from fighter jets to smartphones — is not a coincidence. It is the inevitable result of decades of misguided policy decisions, regulatory paralysis, and a globalist mindset that surrendered critical industries to foreign adversaries. While China strategically built a near-monopoly by subsidizing production and slashing red tape, America shackled its own industries with endless permitting delays, environmental extremism, and wishful thinking about “free trade” in a world where our biggest competitor was playing by no rules at all.

By the early 2000s, China controlled over 90% of global rare earth production. They didn’t just mine the minerals — they cornered the critical downstream processing and manufacturing supply chains. America, once the leader, became a customer. A dependent. For decades, policymakers sat idle as China plotted to dominate industries critical to our national security.

Background: How We Lost the Lead

Back in the 1980s, America led the world in rare earth production, with Mountain Pass in California operating as the premier source. Then came the regulatory avalanche. Permitting for a new mining project in the United States routinely took 7 to 10 years, and in many cases, projects never even got off the ground. Environmental impact studies, endless layers of agency reviews, and “lawfare” from radical environmental groups weaponized litigation to block, delay, and destroy mining projects.

Between 1990 and 2020, the United States issued fewer than a handful of new mining permits for rare earths. Companies often didn’t even bother applying, knowing the costs, lawsuits, and bureaucratic delays would kill projects before a shovel ever touched dirt.

Meanwhile, China was executing a deliberate plan: flooding the market with cheap rare earths, subsidizing production, slashing environmental standards, and building refining plants at breakneck speed. Their strategy worked. America’s industrial base was hollowed out.

China Tightens the Screws: New Export Restrictions

Today, China is restricting exports of key rare earth materials to the United States. It’s a calculated move to weaponize their monopoly against us. By controlling access to materials essential for national defense, energy infrastructure, and advanced manufacturing, China has gained powerful leverage over American policymakers.

In effect, we handed Beijing the keys to our future technologies and military readiness. This is the price of decades of short-term profit-seeking and environmental radicalism overriding strategic national interests.

What We Must Do: A National Mobilization for Rare Earth Dominance

We must act — and act decisively! This is not a policy tweak. It is a full-scale economic mobilization, like building the Arsenal of Democracy during World War II.

Here’s the game plan:

  1. Expedite Permitting: Thanks to President Trump’s 2025 Executive Order, we can slash permitting times from 7-10 years to 2-3 years. We must hammer through bureaucratic logjams and get projects like Wyoming’s Brook Mine and Texas’s Round Top into full production, fast.
  2. Massive Investment in Domestic Projects: Mining is capital intensive — think $1 billion or more per project. The government should provide tax incentives, loan guarantees, and fast-track approvals for critical mineral development.
  3. Build American Processing Capacity: Mining is just half the battle. China owns the refining process. We must vertically integrate supply chains right here in the USA — mine, process, manufacture — all under American control.
  4. Strategic Stockpiling: Establish a Strategic Rare Earth Reserve, just like we maintain a Strategic Petroleum Reserve, to buffer against supply shocks and support new domestic entrants.
  5. Streamline Environmental Reviews — Without Sacrificing Common Sense: We can protect the environment and still mine responsibly. Common sense regulation, not job-killing red tape, is the order of the day.
  6. Forge International Alliances: Partner with allies like Australia and Canada to build a Western supply network that shuts China out of this critical market.

Conclusion: Reclaiming Our Industrial Future

Make no mistake: This isn’t just about economics. It’s about national security. It’s about American sovereignty. It’s about protecting our freedom.

China’s dominance in rare earths was no accident. It was a strategy — executed ruthlessly. Now it’s our turn to be strategic. If we act boldly — if we act NOW — we can restore America’s rightful place as a mineral, manufacturing, and innovation powerhouse.

This is a second Sputnik moment. Our future — our freedom — depends on reclaiming control over the very building blocks of modern civilization.

As I always say: Free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity, but it needs a level playing field. That means no more being held hostage to China’s whims. Drill, mine, process — and most of all — LEAD.

The future belongs to the free and the brave — not the Communist Party of China.

Congress must act. Investors must act. Entrepreneurs must act. America must act.

Imagine an America once again supplying the world with the resources of the future — cleaner, stronger, freer. That future is within our grasp. Let’s seize it.

Categories
Energy Macro Economics

Speculating on Raoul Pal’s Singular Economy: A Wildly Positive Vision for Everyday American Life by 2030, Featuring Jane

It’s a “Free for All Friday,” and we’re diving into a speculative whirlwind to explore what Raoul Pal’s “singular economy” could mean for the typical American by 2030. Pal’s vision of the Economic Singularity—a tipping point where AI, robotics, and renewable energy make traditional economic models obsolete—promises a world of radical abundance. To bring this to life, we’ll follow Jane, a relatable 35-year-old from suburban Ohio, whose daily existence becomes a near-utopian adventure in this transformative era. We’ll anchor the optimism in Pal’s heavyweight credentials and let crazy-positive what-ifs run wild, imagining a future where Jane’s life is a vibrant canvas of possibility.

Raoul Pal’s Credentials

Raoul Pal isn’t spinning sci-fi yarns—he’s a macroeconomics powerhouse with a proven eye for seismic trends. As co-founder and CEO of Real Vision, he’s built a platform that brings high-level financial insights to the masses. He also heads Global Macro Investor, a research service dissecting global economic shifts. Pal’s career began at Goldman Sachs, managing hedge fund sales in equities and derivatives, before he ran GLG Partners’ hedge fund business. He’s famous for calling megatrends early, like the crypto surge of the 2010s, blending hard data with bold foresight. His focus on exponential tech—Moore’s Law for chips, Wright’s Law for renewables—and his deep dives into AI and energy markets give his “singular economy” concept real heft. When Pal predicts an economy where costs collapse and abundance rules, it’s backed by decades of finance expertise and pattern-spotting savvy.

Meet Jane: A Bio

Jane Miller is our lens into this future—a fictional but grounded 35-year-old living in suburban Columbus, Ohio, in 2030. Born in 1995, she grew up in a middle-class family, the daughter of a nurse and a high school teacher. Jane studied marketing at Ohio State, graduating in 2017, and spent her 20s as a coordinator for a mid-sized ad agency, crafting campaigns for local businesses. She’s single, no kids, but close with her parents and a tight-knit group of friends. Before the singular economy hit, Jane’s life was typical: a modest apartment, a used Honda, and a love for yoga, indie music, and binge-watching sci-fi. She’s curious but not a tech nerd—more practical than visionary, with a knack for connecting with people. By 2030, the Economic Singularity has upended her world, turning her from a 9-to-5 worker into a creative force navigating a landscape of abundance. Jane’s story reflects how an ordinary American might thrive in an extraordinary era, balancing new possibilities with relatable human quirks.

A Crazy-Positive Vision for Jane’s Life in the Singular Economy

In 2030, Jane’s world is a dazzling product of the singular economy’s promise. Pal’s forecast of plummeting costs—energy, computing, production—creates a life where scarcity’s a forgotten concept, and Jane’s days are a playground for creativity and joy. Here’s how the Economic Singularity transforms her routine, with wildly optimistic what-ifs pushing the boundaries of what’s possible.

Morning: A Personal Renaissance

Jane wakes in a home that’s a marvel of the singular economy. Built by robotic 3D printers for the cost of a used car, her house in suburban Columbus is self-sustaining—solar panels and fusion micro-reactors make energy free, powering her lights, appliances, and AI assistant. No longer just a gadget, her AI is a creative collaborator, curating a morning to spark inspiration. It brews coffee, serves breakfast from her backyard hydroponic garden (grown for pennies), and suggests a new passion project—maybe composing music with AI tools or designing a virtual art gallery. The crazy what-if? Jane’s AI is a personal Da Vinci, helping her write a novel before lunch or master quantum physics via neural-streamed MIT courses, all free. Her marketing degree feels quaint now; she’s a lifelong learner, diving into passions her 20s couldn’t afford. Mornings aren’t about rushing—they’re a daily rebirth of curiosity, where creating is as routine as her yoga stretches.

Work: Creators Rule the World

Jane’s old marketing job is extinct—AI handles ads, analytics, everything. But in the singular economy, that’s a gift. She’s a “world-builder,” designing immersive VR experiences (think Star Wars meets choose-your-own-adventure) that millions enjoy globally, earning crypto tokens in a decentralized economy. Her creativity, once confined to client briefs, now shapes worlds. The wild what-if? Every American’s a creator, with AI as their apprentice. Jane’s neighbor, a former truck driver, crafts viral AI-generated comedies; her barista friend runs a metaverse café. Universal Creative Income (UCI), funded by taxes on automated industries, ensures nobody’s left behind—Jane’s stipend lets her experiment without fear. Work’s no ladder to climb; it’s a canvas. She collaborates with global creators, her Ohio roots blending with a borderless vibe, and every project feels like play, not labor.

Daily Life: Abundance as a Lifestyle

Scarcity’s a myth for Jane. Her fridge restocks via drones—lab-grown steak, exotic fruits, cheaper than a candy bar in her college days. Her wardrobe’s a digital wonder: nanotech fabrics shapeshift into styles downloaded from open-source designs, a far cry from her old mall runs. The crazier what-if? Consumption’s now co-creation. Jane invents—a levitating yoga mat, maybe—and shares it on a global platform, earning kudos and tokens. Travel’s effortless: hypersonic pods zip her to Tokyo for dinner (cost: a few bucks), or she teleports to a Martian colony simulation for a date. Healthcare’s seamless—nanobots monitor her vitals, curing ailments before symptoms, covered by a national abundance fund. Jane’s life is a buffet of experiences, no bills to dread. Her sci-fi binges from her 20s feel prophetic—she’s living the future, curating moments over chasing stuff.

Community: A Global Village of Dreamers

Jane’s social life is electric, powered by dirt-cheap connectivity. She’s tight with friends from Nairobi to a lunar base, co-hosting mixed-reality festivals with AI-generated music and holographic art, enjoyed by millions for free. The wildest what-if? Americans form “imagination collectives”—blockchain-powered DAOs for dream projects. Jane’s collective crowdfunds a floating community garden that purifies Columbus’s air, and her role as a vibe curator earns global fans. Inequality’s gone: the singular economy’s wealth—data, IP, renewables—is shared via decentralized systems. Nobody’s a billionaire, but everyone’s rich in time. Her town hosts weekly “idea jams,” where kids and retirees pitch inventions like gravity-defying skateparks. Jane, once shy at parties, now thrives in a global village where her warmth shapes a celebratory community.

The Big Win: Time to Be Human

The ultimate what-if: the singular economy frees Jane to redefine humanity. With survival needs met—food, shelter, health abundant—she’s got endless time to explore. She’s sculpting with light, debating philosophy with AI tutors, or mentoring kids in a virtual Amazon rainforest. Crime’s down (abundance kills desperation), and mental health soars—AI therapists are as common as the apps she used to scroll. Jane’s not chasing status; she’s chasing meaning. Her old worries—student loans, job security—are ancient history. The singular economy makes her a philosopher-poet-explorer, living in a world where tech amplifies soul, not stress. Every day’s a chance to grow, connect, and dream bigger, her Ohio heart now beating for a boundless future.

Why This Feels (Kinda) Plausible

Pal’s vision isn’t pure fantasy—his credentials make it tangible. Real Vision thrives on unpacking trends like AI’s exponential growth and renewables’ cost collapse (solar’s down 80% in a decade). He called crypto booms years early, and his finance pedigree—Goldman, GLG—shows he gets how money flows. The singular economy’s rooted in data: tech costs are cratering, production’s automating, energy’s democratizing. This crazy-positive spin skips glitches—tech fails, cultural pushback—but Pal’s point is abundance is near. His trend-spotting makes Jane’s utopia feel like a few breakthroughs away, a world where every American’s a creator, not a cog.

In this Free for All Friday fever dream, Jane Miller’s life—a blend of her grounded Ohio roots and the singular economy’s wild promise—shows what’s possible when abundance rules. From her marketing days to her role as a world-builder, she’s living Pal’s vision: an America where time, not money, is the ultimate currency, and every day’s a chance to reinvent what it means to be human.

Categories
Government Macro Economics

Stakeholder Capitalism Fails Because It Forgets the Power of Free Markets

There’s a quiet revolution stirring—and it’s not coming from activist boardrooms or ESG committees. It’s coming from markets, investors, and everyday shareholders who are finally demanding a return to clarity, accountability, and growth. After years of drifting into the foggy waters of stakeholder capitalism, the world is beginning to remember an eternal economic truth: profits aren’t the problem. They are the solution.

Let’s call it what it is—stakeholder capitalism, buoyed by ESG orthodoxy, has been a costly detour from prosperity. It emerged in part as a public relations response to the 2008 financial crisis, when taxpayers were forced to bail out major banks that had caused the meltdown. Instead of reform or accountability, elites offered lip service through stakeholder rhetoric—an attempt to appease a disillusioned public without changing the power structure. A feel-good fantasy sold by billionaires and bureaucrats, it promised everything to everyone: higher wages, greener companies, more inclusive boardrooms, happier communities, and sustained growth. What did it deliver? Lagging returns, bloated corporate bureaucracies, and a widening wealth gap that favored the elite over the everyday investor.

This wasn’t capitalism with a conscience—it was capitalism with a fog machine. ESG scores were treated like moral compasses, yet they often disagreed wildly. One firm’s “climate champion” was another’s “carbon criminal.” It was chaos masquerading as clarity. And behind the curtain? Well-compensated executives pocketing bonuses while stockholders nursed 2% dividends and watched their shares underperform.

Milton Friedman, whose legacy still lights the path forward, warned us. The business of business is business. That doesn’t mean ignoring ethics—it means honoring the social contract of capitalism: deliver value, create growth, and let profits be the yardstick. In doing so, firms create jobs, raise wages, and fund innovation. Everyone wins. That’s the beauty of the free enterprise system.

Meanwhile, ESG funds lagged the broader market, Europe’s stakeholder economies stalled, and in the United States, despite all the lofty pledges, shareholder value took a back seat. BlackRock’s assets ballooned to $10 trillion by 2024, according to company filings and Bloomberg data on the back of the ESG craze, while small investors got left behind. It was regulatory arbitrage dressed up as virtue. And it didn’t deliver results.

But here’s the good news—the pendulum is swinging back. In Q1 of 2025 alone, ESG funds saw $2 billion in outflows. Proxy battles are erupting in boardrooms from coast to coast. The message is clear: investors want profits, not platitudes. They want growth, not guilt. They want companies to compete, not to cosplay as mini-governments.

It’s time to revive what works. Capitalism, unshackled by political fashion, produces the very outcomes stakeholder theorists claim to want: just look at the U.S. tech sector, where profit-driven innovation has led to groundbreaking products, job creation, and rising wages: rising living standards, better products, dynamic economies. But it does so through discipline, innovation, and clear incentives—not through committee meetings and carbon accounting.

The world doesn’t need corporations to be social engineers. It needs them to be productive, profitable, and competitive. That’s how we build wealth for everyone—from retirees to workers, from entrepreneurs to consumers. That’s how we restore the American Dream.

Milton Friedman had it right. And today, as markets reject ESG excess and refocus on fundamentals, the future looks bright again. The fallacy of stakeholder capitalism is fading, and the free market—powered by profits, liberty, and opportunity—is rising once more.

Let’s embrace it.

Categories
Government Macro Economics

Recession? Not So Fast. The Data Say Otherwise

Ever since President Donald Trump’s landslide re-election in November 2024, the media-industrial complex and its political allies have been screaming one word louder than ever: recession. Cable news pundits, legacy newspapers, and a veritable army of social media doom-posters are ringing the alarm bells. “The Trump economy is on the brink,” they tell us. “Brace for impact.”

But here at Optimum Broadband, we believe in logic, not hysteria. Facts, not feelings. And the facts? They tell a very different story.

The Kudlow Rule: Growth Is Growth

Let’s start with the basics. As of Q1 2025, U.S. GDP is growing at an annualized rate of 2 to 2.5%, according to preliminary numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. That’s not booming—but it’s steady, sustainable growth.

Unemployment sits at 4.1%—a hair above last year, but still near multi-decade lows. Consumer spending remains strong, particularly in services, retail, and travel. And core inflation? Tamed, hovering around 3%.

The Federal Reserve, wisely holding rates steady at 4.5–4.75%, seems to agree: the economy is on solid footing.

That’s not a recession. That’s a durable, dynamic economy adjusting to global turbulence—and emerging stronger.

Manufactured Panic: TDS in the Markets

So why the panic? Why are networks like CNN and The New York Times flooding the zone with stories about “economic peril”? Why are progressive influencers lighting up X (formerly Twitter) with end-is-nigh memes?

Because they’re suffering from an old affliction: Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS)—the irrational need to paint any success under Trump as failure.

It’s the same playbook they used during his first term. When Trump cut taxes, they predicted deficits would destroy us. When he deregulated energy, they screamed climate Armageddon. When he renegotiated trade deals, they cried “trade war.” And when wages rose, unemployment fell, and the stock market hit record highs—they called it a fluke.

Now, in 2025, they’re back at it—ignoring the fundamentals in favor of a narrative.

There Are Risks—But They’re Manageable

To be fair, this isn’t a perfect economy. There are risks. Business investment has pulled back slightly, especially in manufacturing and logistics, as companies digest Trump’s updated tariff policies on China.

Housing starts have cooled, thanks to high mortgage rates. And some stress remains in the regional banking sector—echoes of 2023’s Silicon Valley Bank mess—but federal regulators are watching it closely and responding with targeted reforms, not sweeping overreach.

And yes, the S&P 500 is down about 5% from its January peak. But even that’s a correction, not a collapse. Stocks rise and fall—it’s the long-term trend that matters. And long-term, America under pro-growth leadership remains the best investment on the planet.

A Tale of Two Narratives

One of the more underreported stories of the last decade is the degree to which partisan perception drives economic sentiment. A landmark 2024 study by the American Political Science Association confirmed what many of us suspected: Democrats routinely rate the economy worse under Republican presidents—even when the actual data is strong.

So when the media blares “Recession!” 24/7, it’s less about the economy and more about the narrative. It’s emotional politics masquerading as economics.

At Optimum Broadband, we’re not interested in spin. We look at industrial production, consumer confidence, the yield curve, energy output, and labor participation. Those are the vital signs of a real economy. And they aren’t flashing red—they’re mostly green.

Trump’s Tariffs: Strategic, Targeted, and Pro-Growth

Let’s take a moment to clear the air about Trump’s latest round of tariffs. The usual suspects in the media and academia are once again crying “trade war” and predicting economic ruin. But here’s the truth: Trump’s tariffs aren’t about isolationism—they’re about leverage.

The president’s new “America First 2.0” trade strategy is a continuation of what he started in his first term: holding foreign competitors accountable, particularly China, for decades of cheating, IP theft, currency manipulation, and mercantilist abuse.

These tariffs are not blanket taxes on all imports—they’re surgical tools aimed at strategic sectors: semiconductors, EV batteries, solar panels, and critical rare-earth minerals where the U.S. must secure its supply chains. This is economic security, not protectionism.

Critics say tariffs raise prices. That’s textbook theory, not real-world economics. What they miss is that tariffs can shift global supply chains in our favor, bring manufacturing jobs back home, and reduce dependence on hostile nations. We’re already seeing companies diversify production away from China and invest in the U.S., Mexico, and trusted allies. That’s a win.

Even the Congressional Budget Office, hardly a cheerleader for the Trump agenda, admits the tariffs could result in a net GDP boost if implemented alongside tax and regulatory reforms. That’s exactly what’s happening now.

In classic economics : incentives matter. Tariffs, when paired with the right domestic policy mix, incentivize American production, innovation, and job creation. They send a signal to the world: if you want access to the U.S. market, play by our rules.

That’s not anti-trade. That’s pro-fair trade—and it’s long overdue.

America’s Economic Engine Is Still Running

Trump’s economic blueprint—lower taxes, fewer regulations, energy independence, and fair trade—is once again creating the conditions for growth.

Yes, there’s uncertainty in global markets. Yes, China remains a threat. But under strong leadership, America is doing what it always does: adapting, innovating, producing.

In the words of Larry Kudlow, “Free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity.” And in 2025, that path is still open—despite the noise from the peanut gallery.

Final Thought: Turn Down the Volume, Tune into the Data

If you’re feeling anxious about the economy, we get it. The headlines are loud. The social feeds are louder. But here’s our advice:

Don’t follow the fear. Follow the fundamentals.

There’s no recession today. And with the right policies in place—ones that unleash growth rather than stifle it—there won’t be one tomorrow either.

Keep your eye on the numbers. Ignore the clickbait. And remember: the American economy doesn’t run on panic—it runs on productivity.

Categories
Macro Economics

Time for a US Sovereign Wealth Fund

It’s a new day for American economic policy – and the opportunity before us is historic. With the global economy evolving rapidly and national debt continuing to mount, the U.S. is finally exploring an idea that successful nations like Norway, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates have embraced for years: the sovereign wealth fund. These countries have used their sovereign funds to turn natural resource wealth and fiscal surpluses into powerful engines for long-term prosperity. Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global, for example, has ballooned to over $1.4 trillion, distributing the benefits of its oil wealth to every citizen and safeguarding its economy for generations.

Now, under the leadership of President Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Commerce Secretary  Howard Lutnick, America is poised to step into this space with a uniquely ambitious vision. And let me tell you – this isn’t just smart economics, it’s America First economics.

For decades, we’ve talked about unleashing the full potential of American assets. Well, here’s the moment. Instead of watching our government bloat the balance sheet with more and more debt, why not flip the script and invest in America? That’s what this fund does – it takes underutilized government assets, like our stakes in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and turns them into wealth-building opportunities for all Americans.

Howard Lutnick’s proposal to obtain equity or warrants when the government makes major purchases is simply genius. Think about it – when Uncle Sam spends big, the American people should get a return on that investment. This is how we bring market discipline into government spending. It’s shareholder capitalism — with the taxpayers as the shareholders.

This is a pro-growth strategy. It’s a jobs strategy. It’s a prosperity-for-everyone strategy. And most importantly, it’s a vision that says government should be a partner in wealth creation, not just a redistributor.

Let’s take a page from Norway’s playbook – but do it the American way. Bigger, better, and driven by innovation, entrepreneurship, and the dynamism of our free-market system. From tech to energy to biotech, the opportunities are endless when you have a country like ours at the helm of a professionally managed, transparent, and accountable investment vehicle.

This could be the beginning of a new era – one where American families feel the upside of American power. Lower taxes, smarter infrastructure, stronger retirement security, and a booming economy. That’s the Kudlow way. That’s the American way.

Policy Recommendation:

To ensure the U.S. sovereign wealth fund launches with strength and credibility, the administration should begin by capitalizing it with a portfolio of existing federal equity stakes – including positions in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and any publicly traded assets currently held by government entities. Additionally, Congress should authorize a new “American Prosperity Fund Act,” empowering the Treasury and Commerce Departments to negotiate equity or warrant agreements in exchange for future large-scale federal expenditures—such as infrastructure contracts, clean energy development, and pharmaceutical procurements. The fund should be managed independently with a professional board, subject to strict transparency requirements, and structured so that a portion of returns are reinvested while another portion is distributed annually as dividends to American citizens—similar to Alaska’s Permanent Fund model. This ensures broad-based benefit and builds long-term public trust.

This should not be a partisan issue. It’s time for Democrats to show they truly care about working-class Americans—not just with words, but with actions that deliver real, generational wealth. A sovereign wealth fund is a chance for both parties to unite around economic opportunity and shared prosperity. If we’re serious about lifting up all Americans, then we must come together now to make this vision a reality.

The United States has long been a beacon of free enterprise, innovation, and boundless opportunity. A sovereign wealth fund gives us the chance to double down on those strengths – to turn our government into a strategic investor, and our citizens into stakeholders in the national success story. The time to act is now. Let’s seize this moment and build the next great chapter of American prosperity – not just for Wall Street, but for every Main Street in this great country.

Categories
Macro Economics

  Yellen’s Disaster of Short-Term Debt: A Fiscal Crisis  Scott Bessent Must Undo

   Introduction

Janet Yellen’s tenure as U.S. Treasury Secretary, from January 26, 2021, to early 2025, will be remembered as a catastrophic failure of fiscal stewardship, marked by her reckless and shortsighted obsession with issuing short-term debt. Her strategy—born of either incompetence or willful neglect—has plunged the U.S. economy into a maelstrom of refinancing risks, crippling interest rate exposure, and a tarnished fiscal reputation, leaving a $34 trillion debt burden teetering on the edge of disaster. As of March 19, 2025, Scott Bessent, whether as the newly appointed Treasury Secretary or a prospective leader, inherits this smoldering wreckage, tasked with salvaging an economy battered by Yellen’s egregious missteps. This paper dissects the damage she inflicted and outlines the monumental challenges Bessent must overcome to restore stability.

   Background: Yellen’s Short-Term Debt Legacy

Under Yellen’s disastrous oversight, the U.S. Treasury leaned heavily on short-term instruments, such as Treasury bills with maturities of less than one year, to fund the government’s insatiable borrowing needs during the COVID-19 recovery and beyond. Initially justified by low interest rates in the early 2020s, her refusal to pivot to longer maturities as rates soared in 2022 betrayed a staggering lack of foresight. By 2025, with the national debt exceeding $34 trillion, a significant portion now demands constant refinancing at punishingly high rates—a direct consequence of Yellen’s myopic strategy. For Bessent, this skewed debt profile is not just a challenge but a fiscal time bomb requiring immediate defusal.

   The Inherited Economic Challenges

1.   Mounting Refinancing Risk   

   Yellen’s folly has saddled Bessent with the Sisyphean task of rolling over billions in short-term debt monthly, often at rates that have skyrocketed since her tenure began. With the Federal Reserve holding rates above 5% in 2025 to tame persistent inflation, refinancing costs have exploded—debt once issued at 0.1% in 2021 now renews at over 5%. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) warns that annual interest payments could hit $1 trillion by 2030, a fiscal albatross Yellen strapped to the nation’s back, choking off resources for critical priorities.

2.   Interest Rate Vulnerability   

   Yellen’s shortsightedness has left the Treasury nakedly exposed to interest rate swings, a vulnerability Bessent must now wrestle into submission. Short-term debt, unlike the long-term securities she shunned, ties borrowing costs to volatile market conditions. As rates climbed relentlessly from 2022, her failure to secure low rates for the long haul has proven ruinous. Bessent faces an uphill battle to stabilize this chaos, with every rate fluctuation threatening to deepen the wound Yellen carved.

3.   Restoring Fiscal Credibility   

   The global perception of U.S. fiscal reliability lies in tatters, a casualty of Yellen’s reckless reliance on short-term debt. The 2023 Fitch Ratings downgrade from AAA to AA+—a humiliating rebuke—laid bare the risks of her approach, amplifying market unease. Bessent must now rebuild trust among investors wary of a government that Yellen left scrambling to refinance its obligations, a task made harder by the specter of higher yields demanded to offset her legacy of instability.

   Bessent’s Strategic Options

To claw back from Yellen’s abyss, Bessent can pursue several urgent measures:

1.   Lengthening Debt Maturities   

   Bessent must immediately shift issuance toward long-term securities—10- and 30-year bonds—to break the cycle of perpetual refinancing Yellen entrenched. Though rates are higher than the golden opportunity she squandered in 2021, this move could shield the economy from further rate shocks, offering a stability she never valued.

2.   Debt Restructuring Initiatives   

   Innovative tools like callable bonds or debt swaps could help Bessent convert Yellen’s short-term mess into manageable long-term obligations. These steps, though intricate, might temper market disruption and begin repairing the damage her negligence unleashed.

3.   Coordination with the Federal Reserve   

   Bessent could seek tacit alignment with the Federal Reserve to manage rate expectations, a lifeline Yellen never grasped. While the Fed’s independence limits overt collaboration, strategic signaling could ease the refinancing burden she magnified, giving Bessent breathing room to enact reforms.

   Obstacles and Trade-Offs

Bessent’s mission is a Herculean one, hampered by Yellen’s legacy of elevated rates that make long-term debt costlier than it should have been. Market appetite for Treasuries may falter if rate hikes loom, forcing higher yields to lure investors—a bitter pill traceable to her inaction. Political gridlock, too, could thwart his efforts, with Congress likely to balk at the interest costs Yellen’s blunders have normalized.

   Analysis: A Pivotal Moment

Yellen’s tenure stands as a cautionary tale of fiscal malpractice, her short-term debt fixation a gamble that backfired spectacularly. Bessent inherits a Treasury bleeding from her wounds, with interest payments devouring the budget and economic flexibility in tatters. The 1970s, when similar shortsightedness fueled a debt crisis, echo as a grim warning. Bessent’s response—whether bold restructuring or cautious stabilization—will define whether he can reverse her course or merely delay the reckoning she ensured.

   Conclusion  Scott Bessent confronts a fiscal nightmare forged by Janet Yellen’s disastrous reliance on short-term debt. Her legacy is one of squandered opportunity and inflicted harm, leaving behind a nation vulnerable to refinancing chaos and spiraling costs. Bessent’s charge—to lengthen maturities, innovate financing, and restore trust—is a tall order, but essential to avert the collapse Yellen’s policies courted. His success will determine whether the U.S. economy emerges from her shadow or sinks deeper

Categories
Macro Economics

Social Security Unshackled: Unleashing the S&P 500

Introduction

I owe David Friedberg a shout out. The guy’s a tech wizard—ex-Google hotshot, sold The Climate Corporation for a cool $930 million—and his riff on the All-In Podcast lit a fire under me. He tossed out a wild idea: shove half the Social Security Trust Fund into the S&P 500. I’m running with it, not because it’s his baby, but because it’s a sledgehammer to the rusting shackles of a system bleeding out by 2032. This isn’t just about saving a fund—it’s about smashing the myth of government handouts, handing workers their rightful slice of America’s corporate jackpot, and fitting Trump’s MAGA war cry like a glove. Buckle up.

The Current Mess of Social Security

The Social Security Trust Fund—$2.7 trillion on paper—is a wheezing dinosaur, chained to U.S. Treasury securities that limp along at 4.8% a year since the ’30s. It’s a slow-motion car wreck—outflows dwarf inflows, and by 2032, it’s toast. Meanwhile, the S&P 500, a roaring testament to American hustle, clocks 11% annually. The gap’s a gut punch: a fund meant to cradle workers is choking on its own cowardice, and I’m not buying the excuses.

The Plan: Equity Over Entitlements

Here’s the play: siphon at least 50% of that $2.7 trillion into the S&P 500—Wall Street’s glitzy prize. Rewind to ’71, post-gold standard, and picture half the fund riding the market’s waves. Today, it’d be $15 trillion—five times its current heft, a third of the S&P 500’s muscle, owned by every grease-stained, clock-punching American. The wins are brutal:

  1. Cash That Lasts: Slam $500 billion into equities now, let it rip at 10.5% a year, and the fund’s a juggernaut—no bankruptcy, no groveling for tax scraps.
  2. Workers Get Their Due: Every payroll nick becomes a golden ticket—shares in Tesla, Walmart, Pfizer—not crumbs from some bureaucrat’s table.

Equity Over Elitism and the Raw Joy of Ownership

Since ’08, the fix was in—cheap cash and Fed voodoo juiced stocks for the suit-and-tie crowd with 401(k)s, while the lunchbox brigade got stiffed with Treasury scraps. Flip that script: every worker scores a piece of the pie. Imagine a steelworker in Pittsburgh or a cashier in Boise ripping open their Social Security statement—“You own 0.0001 shares of Apple, 0.0002 of Amazon.” It’s not a drab number—it’s a middle finger to the elite, a raw, fist-in-the-air thrill of staking a claim in America’s engine room.

A Cynical Take on “Entitlements”

Here’s where it gets ugly. Social Security and Medicare—funded by workers and their bosses through payroll sweat—aren’t “entitlements” like Medicaid, doled out from Uncle Sam’s piggy bank. They’re ours, damn it, administered for us, not gifted by some benevolent overlord. But Washington’s spun it—lumping them with welfare to paint us as moochers, not earners. It’s a con, a semantic sleight-of-hand to keep us bowing to the feds instead of standing tall as the funders. Equity ownership blows that lie wide open—your labor, your stake, no handouts.

A Sovereign Wealth Fund, Not a Politician’s Prop

This $15 trillion beast would be the planet’s fattest sovereign wealth fund—not some king’s stash, but a worker-built titan. Norway’s got its $1.4 trillion oil kitty; we’d have a people’s empire, born from calluses and clock-ins. It’s already there, mislabeled as a trust fund, rotting in Treasuries. Why? Not just old debt habits—politicians hoarded it to hog the glory. Investing in the S&P 500 would’ve spotlighted America’s free-market dynamo, not D.C.’s puppet masters. They’d rather us grovel, cradle-to-grave, than cheer the capitalism that actually pays the bills.

Work’s Worth, Not Washington’s Whims

This is about guts, not government. Every Social Security cut from your check turns into a war chest—shares in Ford, Netflix, Boeing. Friedberg’s teary-eyed toilet-scrubbing tale hits home: work should mean something. “Log in and see what you own,” he mused. For the welder, the nurse, the driver—it’s not just a wage; it’s a legacy, a loud-and-proud “I built this.” No more begging D.C. for scraps—your labor’s the fuel, and the market’s the furnace.

The Real Reason It Never Happened

History’s a clue, but cynicism’s the key. Sure, the ’30s needed Treasury buyers, but today, the fund’s 8% of the pile—peanuts next to the Fed and foreigners. The real scam? Politicians didn’t want the S&P 500 stealing their thunder. A booming fund tied to free markets would’ve screamed American ingenuity—Ford’s assembly lines, Jobs’ garage—not congressional grandstanding. They kept it in Treasuries to keep us dependent, addicted to their “generosity,” not liberated by our own system’s horsepower.

Feasibility Despite the Fearmongers

It’s not rocket science. Canada’s pension fund bets 20% on stocks; U.S. feds cash in via S&P 500 options in their Thrift plan. Half-in works—period. The ’08 crash—down 37%—makes suits sweat, but the fund’s a marathon runner, not a sprinter. That 11% average shrugs off dips; toss in bonds for a 50/50 split, and it’s steady as steel. Politicos will wail “gambling!”—let ’em. Show workers their shares, and it’s not a dice roll—it’s theirs.

Trump’s MAGA Match

This is MAGA catnip—Trump’s “Make America Great Again” distilled into dollars and defiance. He’d crow: “We’re making Social Security yuge—the biggest fund ever, folks, bigger than China’s, owned by you, the forgotten worker. Tremendous.” It’s populist dynamite—socking the coastal snobs, arming flyover country with Wall Street clout. It’s jobs roaring back, pride surging, America flexing—a red-hat rally in financial form, all while dunking on global wannabes.

The Bigger, Grittier Picture

This is America unchained. Equity statements—gritty proof of ownership—would weld workers to the nation’s winning streak, spitting in the eye of despair. A $15 trillion fund’s a global haymaker, built by the people, not parasites. Work becomes a warrior’s badge—every shift a brick in the empire, not a plea for D.C.’s pity.

Conclusion Friedberg’s spark lit this fuse, but I’m fanning the flames. Shoving half the Social Security Trust Fund into the S&P 500 isn’t a tweak—it’s a reckoning. A $15 trillion worker-owned titan, equity stubs that scream “mine,” and a gut-shot to the entitlement lie—it’s raw, real, and MAGA to the core. Washington’s kept us on a leash, hogging credit for our cash. Time to cut the cord, unleash the market, and let workers rule. This is ours—let’s take it.

Categories
Macro Economics

 The Ballooning Government Debt: A Consequence of Neo-Keynesian Overreach and the Neglect of Milton Friedman’s Monetary Theory

The United States and many advanced economies are grappling with unprecedented levels of government debt, a crisis exacerbated by decades of policy rooted in Neo-Keynesian thought. This paradigm, a synthesis of John Maynard Keynes’ demand-side economics with neoclassical principles, has fostered a belief that government spending is inherently beneficial, even when it fails to generate productive economic activity. Meanwhile, Milton Friedman’s monetary theory, which emphasizes the primacy of money supply control and fiscal restraint, has been sidelined. Friedman’s warnings about the limits of discretionary intervention and the inflationary risks of excessive money creation stand in stark contrast to the Neo-Keynesian orthodoxy that dominates today. This paper argues that the colossal government debt we face is a direct result of overreliance on Neo-Keynesian assumptions—epitomized by the notion that all government spending is good—coupled with a dismissal of Friedman’s disciplined monetary framework.

Neo-Keynesian thought gained prominence by advocating government intervention to boost aggregate demand, particularly during economic downturns. Its modern iteration, bolstered by economists like Paul Krugman and Olivier Blanchard, has extended this logic to justify expansive fiscal policies even in times of relative stability. The 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this trend, with governments unleashing trillions in stimulus packages—often with bipartisan support—under the Neo-Keynesian banner that spending stimulates growth. The U.S. national debt, surpassing $34 trillion by early 2025, reflects this approach, as policymakers embraced deficits as a tool to “prime the pump” without rigorous scrutiny of their productivity.

Central to Neo-Keynesian ideology is the assumption that government spending, regardless of its form, generates a multiplier effect that outweighs its costs. Infrastructure projects, social programs, and even poorly targeted subsidies are defended as economic catalysts, despite evidence that much of this expenditure fails to yield sustainable growth. For instance, the 2021 American Rescue Plan injected $1.9 trillion into the economy, yet studies suggest significant portions were funneled into consumption rather than investment, inflating demand without enhancing productive capacity. This carte blanche approach to spending has normalized deficits, entrenching the view that debt is a manageable byproduct of progress.

Friedman’s Monetary Theory: A Road Not Taken

Milton Friedman offered a starkly different perspective, rooted in the Quantity Theory of Money and a skepticism of government overreach. He argued that economic stability hinges on controlling the money supply, not on endless fiscal expansion. In *A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960*, Friedman and Anna Schwartz demonstrated how monetary mismanagement, rather than insufficient demand, drove the Great Depression—a critique that implicitly challenged Keynesian reliance on spending. His policy prescription was clear: maintain steady, predictable money supply growth and avoid discretionary interventions that distort markets or fuel inflation.

Friedman’s monetarism also carried a fiscal corollary: government spending should be restrained, as excessive borrowing and money creation sow the seeds of economic instability. He viewed inflation as “always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,” warning that printing money to finance deficits—whether directly or through central bank purchases—would erode purchasing power and burden future generations. Had Friedman’s principles guided policy, the unchecked debt accumulation of recent decades might have been curbed by a focus on monetary discipline and productive allocation of resources.

 How Neo-Keynesian Overreliance Fuels Debt

The neglect of Friedman’s insights is evident in the trajectory of government debt. Neo-Keynesian policies have encouraged a spending spree detached from economic fundamentals. Post-2008 quantitative easing, where central banks bought government bonds to finance deficits, exemplifies this trend—effectively monetizing debt in a manner Friedman cautioned against. By 2025, U.S. debt-to-GDP ratios exceed 130%, levels unseen since World War II, yet Neo-Keynesian advocates argue that low interest rates render such burdens sustainable. This optimism ignores the crowding-out effect, where government borrowing siphons capital from private investment, and the risk of future inflation as money supply growth outpaces output.

Moreover, the Neo-Keynesian fetishization of spending overlooks productivity. Projects like high-speed rail boondoggles or bloated bureaucracies consume resources without delivering commensurate economic value, yet they are justified as “stimulus.” Friedman’s framework, by contrast, would demand accountability: government outlays should align with a stable monetary environment, not serve as a catch-all solution to every downturn. The 1970s stagflation, which validated monetarism by exposing the limits of Keynesian demand management, has been forgotten, replaced by a dogma that equates deficits with virtue.

Consequences of Ignoring Friedman

The consequences of this imbalance are dire. Ballooning debt threatens fiscal sustainability, with interest payments alone projected to surpass $1 trillion annually by the late 2020s, diverting funds from productive uses. The Neo-Keynesian dismissal of monetary restraint has also fueled asset bubbles and eroded savings, as loose policy distorts price signals—outcomes Friedman predicted. Meanwhile, the absence of his rules-based approach leaves policymakers ill-equipped to address emerging challenges, such as cryptocurrency’s impact on money supply or the inflationary pressures of supply-chain disruptions.

 Conclusion

The towering government debt of 2025 is a testament to Neo-Keynesian overreach, a paradigm that venerates spending as an economic panacea while ignoring Milton Friedman’s monetary wisdom. By treating all government expenditure as inherently good, even when it fails to produce tangible results, Neo-Keynesian thought has paved the way for fiscal recklessness. Friedman’s call for monetary discipline and fiscal prudence offers a corrective lens, one that could have tempered the debt spiral had it not been overshadowed. To avert a looming crisis, economists must reconsider their reliance on Neo-Keynesian orthodoxy and revive the insights of monetarism, ensuring that policy prioritizes productivity over profligacy.